↓ Skip to main content

Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey)
Published in
BMC Research Notes, May 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13104-023-06337-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mayumi Kataoka, Risa Kotake, Hiroki Asaoka, Yuki Miyamoto, Daisuke Nishi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#20,197,854
of 24,831,063 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,200
of 4,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,460
of 390,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#33
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,831,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.