You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of green tea on reward learning in healthy individuals: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-84 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiangye Zhang, Hongchao Yang, Jian Wang, Aiwu Li, Wentong Zhang, Xinhai Cui, Kelai Wang |
| Abstract |
Both clinical and preclinical studies revealed that regular intake of green tea reduced the prevalence of depressive symptoms, as well as produced antidepressant-like effects in rodents. Evidence proposed that disturbed reward learning has been associated with the development of anhedonia, a core symptom of depression. However, the relationship between green tea and reward learning is poorly investigated. Our goal was to test whether chronic treatment with green tea in healthy subjects affects the process of reward learning and subsequently regulates the depressive symptoms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,829,441
of 25,381,384 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#457
of 1,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,995
of 204,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.