You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of the effectiveness of antibody and cell-mediated immunity against inhaled and instilled influenza virus challenge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology Journal, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-422x-10-198 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katie Rivers, Larry E Bowen, Jin Gao, Kevin Yang, John E Trombley, J Kyle Bohannon, Maryna C Eichelberger |
| Abstract |
To evaluate immunity against influenza, mouse challenge studies are typically performed by intranasal instillation of a virus suspension to anesthetized animals. This results in an unnatural environment in the lower respiratory tract during infection, and therefore there is some concern that immune mechanisms identified in this model may not reflect those that protect against infectious virus particles delivered directly to the lower respiratory tract as an aerosol. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 32% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2013.
All research outputs
#12,877,848
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,205
of 3,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,591
of 196,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#39
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.