You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long-term follow-up of a high- and a low-intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dental setting– a randomized trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-592 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eva Nohlert, John Öhrvik, Åke Tegelberg, Per Tillgren, Ásgeir R Helgason |
Abstract |
Achieving lifelong tobacco abstinence is an important public health goal. Most studies use 1-year follow-ups, but little is known about how good these are as proxies for long-term and life-long abstinence. Also, intervention intensity is an important issue for development of efficient and cost-effective cessation treatment protocols.The study aims were to assess the long-term effectiveness of a high- and a low-intensity treatment (HIT and LIT) for smoking cessation and to analyze to what extent 12-month abstinence predicted long-term abstinence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Spain | 1 | 17% |
Ireland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 37% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,774,273
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,680
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,606
of 199,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#86
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.