You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Faecal immunochemical test accuracy in patients referred for surveillance colonoscopy: a multi-centre cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Gastroenterology, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-230x-12-94 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jochim S Terhaar sive Droste, Sietze T van Turenhout, Frank A Oort, René WM van der Hulst, Vincent A Steeman, Usha Coblijn, Lisette van der Eem, Ruud Duijkers, Anneke A Bouman, Gerrit A Meijer, Annekatrien CTM Depla, Pieter Scholten, Ruud JLF Loffeld, Veerle MH Coupé, Chris JJ Mulder |
| Abstract |
Given the increasing burden on colonoscopy capacity, it has been suggested that faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results could guide surveillance colonoscopy intervals. Against this background, we have evaluated the test accuracy of single and double FIT sampling to detect colorectal cancer (CRC) and/or advanced adenomas in an asymptomatic colonoscopy-controlled high-risk population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,805,293
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#1,155
of 1,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,290
of 165,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#24
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.