↓ Skip to main content

Continuous renal replacement therapy outcomes in acute kidney injury and end-stage renal disease: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous renal replacement therapy outcomes in acute kidney injury and end-stage renal disease: a cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc12780
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew S Allegretti, David JR Steele, Jo Ann David-Kasdan, Ednan Bajwa, John L Niles, Ishir Bhan

Abstract

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a widely used but resource-intensive treatment. Despite its broad adoption in intensive care units (ICUs), it remains challenging to identify patients who would be most likely to achieve positive outcomes with this therapy and to provide realistic prognostic information to patients and families.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Other 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 25 28%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2013.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,509
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,390
of 209,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#26
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.