↓ Skip to main content

Clinical results of proton beam therapy for advanced neuroblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical results of proton beam therapy for advanced neuroblastoma
Published in
Radiation Oncology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-8-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshiko Oshiro, Masashi Mizumoto, Toshiyuki Okumura, Shinji Sugahara, Takashi Fukushima, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Tomohei Nakao, Takayuki Hashimoto, Koji Tsuboi, Haruo Ohkawa, Michio Kaneko, Hideyuki Sakurai

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of proton beam therapy (PBT) for pediatric patients with advanced neuroblastoma. METHODS: PBT was conducted at 21 sites in 14 patients with neuroblastoma from 1984 to 2010. Most patients were difficult to treat with photon radiotherapy. Two and 6 patients were classified into stages 3 and 4, respectively, and 6 patients had recurrent disease. Seven of the 8 patients who received PBT as the initial treatment were classified as the high risk group. Eleven patients had gross residual disease before PBT and 3 had undergone intraoperative radiotherapy before PBT. Five patients received PBT for multiple sites, including remote metastases. Photon radiotherapy was used in combination with PBT for 3 patients. The PBT doses ranged from 19.8 to 45.5 GyE (median: 30.6 GyE). RESULTS: Seven patients are alive with no evidence of disease, 1 is alive with disease progression, and 6 died due to the tumor. Recurrence in the treatment field was not observed and the 3-year locoregional control rate was 82%. Severe acute radiotoxicity was not observed, but 1 patient had narrowing of the aorta and asymptomatic vertebral compression fracture at 29 years after PBT, and hair loss was prolonged in one patient. CONCLUSION: PBT may be a better alternative to photon radiotherapy for children with advanced neuroblastoma, and may be conducted safely for patients with neuroblastoma that is difficult to manage using photon beams.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Other 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,024
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,673
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,274
of 196,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#40
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.