You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does training improve diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater agreement in applying the Berlin radiographic definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome? A multicenter prospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-017-1606-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jin-Min Peng, Chuan-Yun Qian, Xiang-You Yu, Ming-Yan Zhao, Shu-Sheng Li, Xiao-Chun Ma, Yan Kang, Fa-Chun Zhou, Zhen-Yang He, Tie-He Qin, Yong-Jie Yin, Li Jiang, Zhen-Jie Hu, Ren-Hua Sun, Jian-Dong Lin, Tong Li, Da-Wei Wu, You-Zhong An, Yu-Hang Ai, Li-Hua Zhou, Xiang-Yuan Cao, Xi-Jing Zhang, Rong-Qing Sun, Er-Zhen Chen, Bin Du, for the China Critical Care Clinical Trial Group (CCCCTG) |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,609,157
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,792
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,075
of 420,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#35
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.