↓ Skip to main content

Regional differences in severe postpartum hemorrhage: a nationwide comparative study of 1.6 million deliveries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regional differences in severe postpartum hemorrhage: a nationwide comparative study of 1.6 million deliveries
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0473-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Babette W Prick, Joost F von Schmidt auf Altenstadt, Chantal WPM Hukkelhoven, Gouke J Bonsel, Eric AP Steegers, Ben W Mol, Joke M Schutte, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Johannes J Duvekot

Abstract

The incidence of severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is increasing. Regional variation may be attributed to variation in provision of care, and as such contribute to this increasing incidence. We assessed reasons for regional variation in severe PPH in the Netherlands. We used the Netherlands Perinatal Registry and the Dutch Maternal Mortality Committee to study severe PPH incidences (defined as blood loss ≥ 1000 mL) across both regions and neighborhoods of cities among all deliveries between 2000 and 2008. We first calculated crude incidences. We then used logistic multilevel regression analyses, with hospital or midwife practice as second level to explore further reasons for the regional variation. We analyzed 1599867 deliveries in which the incidence of severe PPH was 4.5%. Crude incidences of severe PPH varied with factor three between regions while between neighborhoods variation was even larger. We could not explain regional variation by maternal characteristics (age, parity, ethnicity, socioeconomic status), pregnancy characteristics (singleton, gestational age, birth weight, pre-eclampsia, perinatal death), medical interventions (induction of labor, mode of delivery, perineal laceration, placental removal) and health care setting. In a nationwide study in The Netherlands, we observed wide practice variation in PPH. This variation could not be explained by maternal characteristics, pregnancy characteristics, medical interventions or health care setting. Regional variation is either unavoidable or subsequent to regional variation of a yet unregistered variable.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 24%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 21 24%