↓ Skip to main content

Canadian national surveys on pandemic influenza preparations: pre-pandemic and peri-pandemic findings

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Canadian national surveys on pandemic influenza preparations: pre-pandemic and peri-pandemic findings
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Ritvo, Daniel F Perez, Kumanan Wilson, Jennifer L Gibson, Crissa L Guglietti, C Shawn Tracy, Cecile M Bensimon, Ross EG Upshur, University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics – Pandemic Ethics Working Group

Abstract

Prior to the 2009 H1N1 Influenza pandemic, public health authorities in Canada and elsewhere prepared for the future outbreak, partly guided by an ethical framework developed within the Canadian Program of Research on Ethics in a Pandemic (CanPREP). We developed a telephone-based survey based on that framework, which was delivered across Canada in late 2008. In June, 2009, the WHO declared pandemic Phase 6 status and from the subsequent October (2009) until May 2010, the CanPREP team fielded a second (revised) survey, collecting another 1,000 opinions from Canadians during a period of pre-pandemic anticipation and peri-pandemic experience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 23%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Social Sciences 12 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,690,153
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,389
of 14,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,438
of 197,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#252
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.