↓ Skip to main content

Novel simian foamy virus infections from multiple monkey species in women from the Democratic Republic of Congo

Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel simian foamy virus infections from multiple monkey species in women from the Democratic Republic of Congo
Published in
Retrovirology, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-4690-9-100
Pubmed ID
Authors

William M Switzer, Shaohua Tang, Steve Ahuka-Mundeke, Anupama Shankar, Debra L Hanson, HaoQiang Zheng, Ahidjo Ayouba, Nathan D Wolfe, Matthew LeBreton, Cyrille F Djoko, Ubald Tamoufe, Amandine Esteban, Walid Heneine, Martine Peeters, Linda L Wright, Jean Jacques Muyembe-Tamfum, Emile Okitolonda Wemakoy, Prime Mulembakani, Nicole A Hoff, Anne W Rimoin

Abstract

Zoonotic transmission of simian retroviruses in Central Africa is ongoing and can result in pandemic human infection. While simian foamy virus (SFV) infection was reported in primate hunters in Cameroon and Gabon, little is known about the distribution of SFV in Africa and whether human-to-human transmission and disease occur. We screened 3,334 plasmas from persons living in rural villages in central Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) using SFV-specific EIA and Western blot (WB) tests. PCR amplification of SFV polymerase sequences from DNA extracted from buffy coats was used to measure proviral loads. Phylogenetic analysis was used to define the NHP species origin of SFV. Participants completed questionnaires to capture NHP exposure information.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Kenya 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,024
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#1,061
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,382
of 277,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.