You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and validation of a food-based diet quality index for New Zealand adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-562 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jyh Eiin Wong, Winsome R Parnell, Anna S Howe, Katherine E Black, Paula ML Skidmore |
| Abstract |
As there is no population-specific, simple food-based diet index suitable for examination of diet quality in New Zealand (NZ) adolescents, there is a need to develop such a tool. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an adolescent-specific diet quality index based on dietary information sourced from a Food Questionnaire (FQ) and examine its validity relative to a four-day estimated food record (4DFR) obtained from a group of adolescents aged 14 to 18 years. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2013.
All research outputs
#12,586,202
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,556
of 14,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,171
of 197,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#158
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.