↓ Skip to main content

Association of arterial stiffness with single nucleotide polymorphism rs1333049 and metabolic risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of arterial stiffness with single nucleotide polymorphism rs1333049 and metabolic risk factors
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2840-12-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suphawadee Phababpha, Upa Kukongviriyapan, Poungrat Pakdeechote, Laddawan Senggunprai, Veerapol Kukongviriyapan, Chatri Settasatian, Pyatat Tatsanavivat, Phongsak Intharaphet, Vichai Senthong, Nantarat Komanasin, Nongnuch Settasatian, Stephen E Greenwald

Abstract

Increased arterial stiffness is a cardiovascular outcome of metabolic syndrome (MetS). The chromosome 9p21 locus has been identified as a major locus for risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs1333049 on chromosome 9p21.3 has been strongly associated with CAD and myocardial infarction. Increased arterial stiffness could be the link between the 9p21 polymorphism and increased cardiovascular risk. Since the impact of a genetic polymorphism on arterial stiffness especially in Asian populations has not been well defined, we aimed to investigate the association of arterial stiffness with rs 1333049 variant on chromosome 9p21.3 in Thai subjects with and without MetS risk factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sri Lanka 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Lecturer 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,182,073
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#623
of 1,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,955
of 198,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.