You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavioral and Brain Functions, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-9081-3-23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dénes Szũcs, Fruzsina Soltész, Éva Jármi, Valéria Csépe |
| Abstract |
In the numerical Stroop paradigm (NSP) participants decide whether a digit is numerically or physically larger than another simultaneously presented digit. This paradigm is frequently used to assess the automatic number processing abilities of children. Currently it is unclear whether an equally refined evaluation of numerical magnitude occurs in both controlled (the numerical comparison task of the NSP) and automatic (the physical comparison task of the NSP) numerical comparison in both children and adults. One of our objectives was to respond this question by measuring the speed of controlled and automatic magnitude processing in children and adults in the NSP. Another objective was to determine how the immature executive functions of children affect their cognitive functions relative to adults in numerical comparison. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 29% |
| Researcher | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 65 | 49% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#138
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,724
of 86,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.