You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quality assessment of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the setting of the European CMR registry: description and validation of standardized criteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-55 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincenzo Klinke, Stefano Muzzarelli, Nathalie Lauriers, Didier Locca, Gabriella Vincenti, Pierre Monney, Christian Lu, Detlev Nothnagel, Guenter Pilz, Massimo Lombardi, Albert C van Rossum, Anja Wagner, Oliver Bruder, Heiko Mahrholdt, Juerg Schwitter |
| Abstract |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become an important diagnostic imaging modality in cardiovascular medicine. However, insufficient image quality may compromise its diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to describe and validate standardized criteria to evaluate a) cine steady-state free precession (SSFP), b) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and c) stress first-pass perfusion images. These criteria will serve for quality assessment in the setting of the Euro-CMR registry. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 40% |
| Engineering | 13 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,301,166
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#657
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,430
of 210,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.