↓ Skip to main content

An empirical evaluation of the SF-12, SF-6D, EQ-5D and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the hand

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An empirical evaluation of the SF-12, SF-6D, EQ-5D and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the hand
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12955-016-0584-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melina Dritsaki, Stavros Petrou, Mark Williams, Sarah E. Lamb

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Other 7 7%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 23 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,113,100
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,388
of 2,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,854
of 425,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#22
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.