You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pathways of neighbourhood-level socio-economic determinants of adverse birth outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-072x-12-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gang Meng, Mary E Thompson, G Brent Hall |
| Abstract |
Although socio-economic factors have been identified as one of the most important groups of neighbourhood-level risks affecting birth outcomes, uncertainties still exist concerning the pathways through which they are transferred to individual risk factors. This poses a challenge for setting priorities and developing appropriate community-oriented public health interventions and planning guidelines to reduce the level of adverse birth outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,629,592
of 24,748,616 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#155
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,253
of 201,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,748,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.