↓ Skip to main content

Resource allocation in public sector programmes: does the value of a life differ between governmental departments?

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resource allocation in public sector programmes: does the value of a life differ between governmental departments?
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, December 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12962-023-00500-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Cubi-Molla, David Mott, Nadine Henderson, Bernarda Zamora, Mendel Grobler, Martina Garau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Other 2 25%
Student > Master 2 25%
Librarian 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 3 38%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Decision Sciences 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,548,620
of 25,151,710 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#131
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,497
of 265,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,151,710 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.