You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bench-to-bedside review: Mechanisms and management of hyperthermia due to toxicity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc6177 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florian Eyer, Thomas Zilker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 71% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,771,277
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,543
of 6,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,538
of 168,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.