You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of Korean cats with natural feline coronavirus infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology Journal, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-422x-8-455 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dong-Jun An, Hye-Young Jeoung, WooSeog Jeong, Jee-Yong Park, Myoung-Heon Lee, Bong-Kyun Park |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 22% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 12 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,734,276
of 25,011,749 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#481
of 3,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,836
of 136,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#10
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,011,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.