You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of optimal thalassemia screening strategies for migrant populations in Thailand using a qualitative approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-11831-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julia Z. Xu, Meghan Foe, Wilaslak Tanongsaksakul, Thidarat Suksangpleng, Supachai Ekwattanakit, Suchada Riolueang, Marilyn J. Telen, Bonnie N. Kaiser, Vip Viprakasit |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Lecturer | 6 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Researcher | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 34 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 36 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,294,685
of 25,016,456 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,446
of 16,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,875
of 427,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#34
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,016,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.