You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nasogastric or nasojejunal feeding in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc12790 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu-sui Chang, Hua-qun Fu, Yuan-mei Xiao, Ji-chun Liu |
| Abstract |
Enteral feeding can be given either through the nasogastric or the nasojejunal route. Studies have shown that nasojejunal tube placement is cumbersome and that nasogastric feeding is an effective means of providing enteral nutrition. However, the concern that nasogastric feeding increases the chance of aspiration pneumonitis and exacerbates acute pancreatitis by stimulating pancreatic secretion has prevented it being established as a standard of care. We aimed to evaluate the differences in safety and tolerance between nasogastric and nasojejunal feeding by assessing the impact of the two approaches on the incidence of mortality, tracheal aspiration, diarrhea, exacerbation of pain, and meeting the energy balance in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 24% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| Mexico | 2 | 8% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 20% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 26% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,640,160
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,445
of 6,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,598
of 209,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.