↓ Skip to main content

Comparing variants related to chronic diseases from genome-wide association study (GWAS) and the cancer genome atlas (TCGA)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing variants related to chronic diseases from genome-wide association study (GWAS) and the cancer genome atlas (TCGA)
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, December 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12920-023-01758-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soohyun Jeon, Chaewon Park, Jineui Kim, Jung Hoon Lee, Sung-yune Joe, Young Kyung Ko, Jeong-An Gim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#16,159,666
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#1,102
of 2,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,149
of 348,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#16
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.