You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Post-extubation dysphagia is associated with longer hospitalization in survivors of critical illness with neurologic impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc12791 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Madison Macht, Christopher J King, Tim Wimbish, Brendan J Clark, Alexander B Benson, Ellen L Burnham, André Williams, Marc Moss |
| Abstract |
Critically ill patients can develop acute respiratory failure requiring endotracheal intubation. Swallowing dysfunction after liberation from mechanical ventilation, also known as post-extubation dysphagia, is common and deleterious among patients without neurologic disease. However, the risk factors associated with the development of post-extubation dysphagia and its effect on hospital lengthofstay in critically ill patients with neurologic disorders remains relatively unexplored. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,930,204
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,867
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,537
of 209,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#35
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.