You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating the causal impact of gut microbiota on glioblastoma: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12864-023-09885-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chuan Zeng, Chaolong Zhang, Chunming He, Haimin Song |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,480,996
of 25,055,009 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,565
of 11,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,173
of 184,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#11
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,055,009 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.