↓ Skip to main content

The diagnostic value of ultrasonography in carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The diagnostic value of ultrasonography in carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients
Published in
BMC Neurology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-13-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nai-Wen Tsai, Lian-Hui Lee, Chi-Ren Huang, Wen-Neng Chang, Hung-Chen Wang, Yu-Jun Lin, Wei-Che Lin, Tsu-Kung Lin, Ben-Chung Cheng, Yu-Jih Su, Chia-Te Kung, Shu-Fang Chen, Cheng-Hsien Lu

Abstract

To compare the value of ultrasonography for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,153,791
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,024
of 2,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,764
of 196,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#33
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.