You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The complete plastomes of seven Peucedanum plants: comparative and phylogenetic analyses for the Peucedanum genus
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12870-022-03488-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chang-Kun Liu, Jia-Qing Lei, Qiu-Ping Jiang, Song-Dong Zhou, Xing-Jin He |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,394,208
of 25,081,285 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#705
of 3,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,990
of 435,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#14
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,551 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.