↓ Skip to main content

HIV risk behaviors among female IDUs in developing and transitional countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HIV risk behaviors among female IDUs in developing and transitional countries
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-7-271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles M Cleland, Don C Des Jarlais, Theresa E Perlis, Gerry Stimson, Vladimir Poznyak, the WHO Phase II Drug Injection Collaborative Study Group

Abstract

A number of studies suggest females may be more likely to engage in injection and sex risk behavior than males. Most data on gender differences come from industrialized countries, so data are needed in developing countries to determine how well gender differences generalize to these understudied regions. Between 1999 and 2003, 2512 male and 672 female current injection drug users (IDUs) were surveyed in ten sites in developing countries around the world (Nairobi, Beijing, Hanoi, Kharkiv, Minsk, St. Petersburg, Bogotá, Gran Rosario, Rio, and Santos). The survey included a variety of questions about demographics, injecting practices and sexual behavior. Females were more likely to engage in risk behaviors in the context of a sexual relationship with a primary partner while males were more likely to engage in risk behaviors in the context of close friendships and casual sexual relationships. After controlling for injection frequency, and years injecting, these gender differences were fairly consistent across sites. Gender differences in risk depend on the relational contexts in which risk behaviors occur. The fact that female and male risk behavior often occurs in different relational contexts suggests that different kinds of prevention interventions which are sensitive to these contexts may be necessary.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Social Sciences 9 14%
Psychology 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,935,809
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,425
of 15,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,002
of 73,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.