↓ Skip to main content

Gothenburg very early supported discharge study (GOTVED) NCT01622205: a block randomized trial with superiority design of very early supported discharge for patients with stroke

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gothenburg very early supported discharge study (GOTVED) NCT01622205: a block randomized trial with superiority design of very early supported discharge for patients with stroke
Published in
BMC Neurology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-13-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina S Sunnerhagen, Anna Danielsson, Lena Rafsten, Ann Björkdahl, Åsa B Axelsson, Åsa Nordin, Cathrine A Petersson, Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson, Karin Fröjd

Abstract

Stroke is the disease with the highest costs for hospital care and also after discharge. Early supported discharge (ESD) has shown to be efficient and safe and the best results with well-organised discharge teams and patients with less severe strokes. The aim is to investigate if very early supported discharge (VESD) for stroke patients in need for on-going individualised rehabilitation at home is useful for the patient and cost effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 188 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 48 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 18%
Psychology 32 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 15%
Unspecified 10 5%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 55 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2013.
All research outputs
#2,737,410
of 6,229,837 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#623
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,929
of 99,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#39
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,229,837 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 53rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.