You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The training and development needs of nurses in Indonesia: paper 3 of 3
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-4-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Hennessy, Carolyn Hicks, Aflah Hilan, Yoanna Kawonal |
| Abstract |
Indonesia's recent economic and political history has left a legacy of widespread poverty and serious health problems, and has contributed to marked inequalities in health care. One means of responding to these challenges has been through a reconsideration of the professional roles of nurses, to enable them to deal with the range and complexity of health problems. However, there are currently a number of obstacles to achieving these aims: there is a serious shortfall in trained nurses; the majority of nurses have only limited education and preparation for the role; and there is no central registration of nurses, which means that it is impossible to regulate either the profession or the standards of care. This study aimed to establish the occupational profiles of each grade of nurse, identify their training and development needs and ascertain whether any differences existed between nurses working in different regions or within hospital or community settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 3 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 34 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 20% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,168,167
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#1,002
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,020
of 84,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.