You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Plastome phylogenomic analysis reveals evolutionary divergences of Polypodiales suborder Dennstaedtiineae
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12870-022-03886-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jin-Mei Lu, Xin-Yu Du, Li-Yaung Kuo, Atsushi Ebihara, Leon R. Perrie, Zheng-Yu Zuo, Hui Shang, Yi-Han Chang, De-Zhu Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
Professor | 1 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 67% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,406,203
of 25,113,446 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#706
of 3,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,340
of 435,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#7
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,113,446 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,558 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.