You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Designing a valid randomized pragmatic primary care implementation trial: the my own health report (MOHR) project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-73 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex H Krist, Beth A Glenn, Russell E Glasgow, Bijal A Balasubramanian, David A Chambers, Maria E Fernandez, Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts, Rodger Kessler, Marcia G Ory, Siobhan M Phillips, Debra P Ritzwoller, Dylan H Roby, Hector P Rodriguez, Roy T Sabo, Sherri N Sheinfeld Gorin, Kurt C Stange, The MOHR Study Group |
| Abstract |
There is a pressing need for greater attention to patient-centered health behavior and psychosocial issues in primary care, and for practical tools, study designs and results of clinical and policy relevance. Our goal is to design a scientifically rigorous and valid pragmatic trial to test whether primary care practices can systematically implement the collection of patient-reported information and provide patients needed advice, goal setting, and counseling in response. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Djibouti | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 26% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 11% |
| Psychology | 13 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,707,536
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,129
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,423
of 196,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#21
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.