You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of ‘implications for research’ statements in systematic reviews of interventions in advanced cancer patients – a meta-research study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-023-02124-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W. Siemens, G. Bantle, C. Ebner, A. Blümle, G. Becker, G. Schwarzer, J. J. Meerpohl |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,498,830
of 25,121,692 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#901
of 2,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,222
of 214,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,121,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.