↓ Skip to main content

Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corrina Moucheraud, Amee Schwitters, Chantelle Boudreaux, Denise Giles, Peter H. Kilmarx, Ntolo Ntolo, Zwashe Bangani, Michael E St. Louis, Thomas J Bossert

Abstract

Health information systems are central to strong health systems. They assist with patient and program management, quality improvement, disease surveillance, and strategic use of information. Many donors have worked to improve health information systems, particularly by supporting the introduction of electronic health information systems (EHIS), which are considered more responsive and more efficient than older, paper-based systems. As many donor-driven programs are increasing their focus on country ownership, sustainability of these investments is a key concern. This analysis explores the potential sustainability of EHIS investments in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe, originally supported by the United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). Using a framework based on sustainability theories from the health systems literature, this analysis employs a qualitative case study methodology to highlight factors that may increase the likelihood that donor-supported initiatives will continue after the original support is modified or ends. Findings highlight commonalities around possible determinants of sustainability. The study found that there is great optimism about the potential for EHIS, but the perceived risks may result in hesitancy to transition completely and parallel use of paper-based systems. Full stakeholder engagement is likely to be crucial for sustainability, as well as integration with other activities within the health system and those funded by development partners. The literature suggests that a sustainable system has clearly-defined goals around which stakeholders can rally, but this has not been achieved in the systems studied. The study also found that technical resource constraints - affecting system usage, maintenance, upgrades and repairs - may limit EHIS sustainability even if these other pillars were addressed. The sustainability of EHIS faces many challenges, which could be addressed through systems' technical design, stakeholder coordination, and the building of organizational capacity to maintain and enhance such systems. All of this requires time and attention, but is likely to enhance long-term outcomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 285 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 13%
Researcher 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 71 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 45 16%
Computer Science 38 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 12%
Social Sciences 24 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 23 8%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 76 27%