↓ Skip to main content

Viral and bacterial co-infection in pneumonia: do we know enough to improve clinical care?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Viral and bacterial co-infection in pneumonia: do we know enough to improve clinical care?
Published in
Critical Care, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1592-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly A. Cawcutt, Andre C. Kalil

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 25%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,306,006
of 22,101,071 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,005
of 5,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,130
of 395,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,101,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.