You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of transcutaneous perineal electrostimulation versus intracavitary anal electrostimulation in the treatment of urinary incontinence after a radical prostatectomy: randomized controlled trial study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Urology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12894-020-00718-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Pané-Alemany, I. Ramírez-García, A. Carralero-Martínez, L. Blanco-Ratto, S. Kauffmann, E. Sánchez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,948,776
of 25,144,989 outputs
Outputs from BMC Urology
#37
of 818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,542
of 520,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Urology
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,144,989 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.