↓ Skip to main content

Inflammatory fibroid polyp of the oesophagus

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inflammatory fibroid polyp of the oesophagus
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, May 2005
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-3-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shashi Kanth Godey, Robert T Diggory

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,417,520
of 25,144,989 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#272
of 2,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,829
of 67,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,144,989 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them