You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of ultra processed foods consumption in Senegal: validation of the Nova-UPF screener
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Public Health, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13690-024-01239-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saliou Diombo Kébé, Adama Diouf, Papa Mamadou Dit Doudou Sylla, Kalidou Kane, Caroline dos Santos Costa, Fernanda Helena Marrocos Leite, Giovanna Calixto Andrade, Abdou Badiane, Jean-Claude Moubarac, Nicole Idohou-Dossou, Carlos Augusto Monteiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 7% |
| Brazil | 3 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Senegal | 2 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 24% |
| Scientists | 9 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,372,921
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#46
of 1,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,356
of 357,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.