↓ Skip to main content

A genomic analysis of the archaeal system Ignicoccus hospitalis-Nanoarchaeum equitans

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A genomic analysis of the archaeal system Ignicoccus hospitalis-Nanoarchaeum equitans
Published in
Genome Biology, November 2008
DOI 10.1186/gb-2008-9-11-r158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mircea Podar, Iain Anderson, Kira S Makarova, James G Elkins, Natalia Ivanova, Mark A Wall, Athanasios Lykidis, Kostantinos Mavromatis, Hui Sun, Matthew E Hudson, Wenqiong Chen, Cosmin Deciu, Don Hutchison, Jonathan R Eads, Abraham Anderson, Fillipe Fernandes, Ernest Szeto, Alla Lapidus, Nikos C Kyrpides, Milton H Saier, Paul M Richardson, Reinhard Rachel, Harald Huber, Jonathan A Eisen, Eugene V Koonin, Martin Keller, Karl O Stetter

Abstract

The relationship between the hyperthermophiles Ignicoccus hospitalis and Nanoarchaeum equitans is the only known example of a specific association between two species of Archaea. Little is known about the mechanisms that enable this relationship.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 6%
Brazil 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 133 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Master 19 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 12%
Environmental Science 10 6%
Computer Science 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,650,290
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,100
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,845
of 103,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.