You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A qualitative exploration of young adult smokers’ responses to novel tobacco warnings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-609 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janet Hoek, Anna Hoek-Sims, Philip Gendall |
| Abstract |
Despite reduced smoking among adolescents, smoking prevalence peaks among young adults aged 18-30, many of whom believe themselves exempt from the health risks of smoking shown in warning labels. We explored how young adult smokers perceived warnings featuring proximal risks, and whether these encouraged cessation more effectively than traditional health messages. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 46% |
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Egypt | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 18% |
| Psychology | 6 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,667,047
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,256
of 17,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,242
of 212,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#41
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.