↓ Skip to main content

International comparison of observation-specific spatial buffers: maximizing the ability to estimate physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
International comparison of observation-specific spatial buffers: maximizing the ability to estimate physical activity
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12942-017-0077-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lawrence D. Frank, Eric H. Fox, Jared M. Ulmer, James E. Chapman, Suzanne E. Kershaw, James F. Sallis, Terry L. Conway, Ester Cerin, Kelli L. Cain, Marc A. Adams, Graham R. Smith, Erica Hinckson, Suzanne Mavoa, Lars B. Christiansen, Adriano Akira F. Hino, Adalberto A. S. Lopes, Jasper Schipperijn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 194 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 55 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 12%
Sports and Recreations 23 12%
Environmental Science 16 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 69 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#399
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,986
of 429,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.