You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consensus and conflict cards for metabolic pathway databases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-0509-7-50 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miranda D Stobbe, Morris A Swertz, Ines Thiele, Trebor Rengaw, Antoine HC van Kampen, Perry D Moerland |
| Abstract |
The metabolic network of H. sapiens and many other organisms is described in multiple pathway databases. The level of agreement between these descriptions, however, has proven to be low. We can use these different descriptions to our advantage by identifying conflicting information and combining their knowledge into a single, more accurate, and more complete description. This task is, however, far from trivial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 43% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 48% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,066,203
of 25,079,131 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#651
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,394
of 202,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.