You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Handmade cloning: recent advances, potential and pitfalls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40104-015-0043-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geetika Verma, JS Arora, RS Sethi, CS Mukhopadhyay, Ramneek Verma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 24% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#164
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,611
of 291,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.