You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving economic access to healthy diets in first nations communities in high-income, colonised countries: a systematic scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-023-00895-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda J. Lee, Lisa-Maree Herron, Stephan Rainow, Lisa Wells, Ingrid Kenny, Leon Kenny, Imogen Wells, Margaret Kavanagh, Suzanne Bryce, Liza Balmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 10 | 59% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 19% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,431,237
of 25,464,544 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#688
of 1,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,002
of 326,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,464,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.