You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance features of caseous calcification of the mitral annulus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-10-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorenzo Monti, Eva Renifilo, Manuel Profili, Luca Balzarini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 52% |
| Engineering | 18 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,396,702
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,086
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,500
of 98,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.