You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Thrombelastography (TEG®): practical considerations on its clinical use in trauma resuscitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1757-7241-21-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis Teodoro da Luz, Bartolomeu Nascimento, Sandro Rizoli |
| Abstract |
Thrombelastography is a laboratorial test that measures viscoelastic changes of the entire clotting process. There is growing interest in its clinical use in trauma resuscitation, particularly for managing acute coagulopathy of trauma and assisting decision making concerning transfusion. This review focuses on the clinical use of thrombelastography in trauma, with practical points to consider on its use in civilian and military settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Researcher | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 56 | 27% |
| Unknown | 27 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 55% |
| Engineering | 16 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,093,047
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#201
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,612
of 175,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.