You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cancer screening programs in South-east Asia and Western Pacific
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12913-023-10327-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hwee-Lin Wee, Karen Canfell, Han-Mo Chiu, Kui Son Choi, Brian Cox, Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy, Kate T Simms, Chisato Hamashima, Qianyu Shen, Brandon Chua, Niyomsri Siwaporn, Esther Toes-Zoutendijk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 7 | 44% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 7 | 44% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,523,437
of 25,200,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,932
of 8,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,447
of 154,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#17
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,200,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.