You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A case of Streptococcus canis bacteremia, osteomyelitis, sacroiliitis, myositis, and abscess
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12879-022-07580-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A. L. Van Tol, B. Tang, I. D. Mackie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 31% |
Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,441,465
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,982
of 8,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,651
of 428,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#63
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.