You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Acceptability and adoption of handheld computer data collection for public health research in China: a case study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-68 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xia Wan, H Fisher Raymond, Tiancai Wen, Ding Ding, Qian Wang, Sanghyuk S Shin, Gonghuan Yang, Wanxing Chai, Peng Zhang, Thomas E Novotny |
Abstract |
Handheld computers for data collection (HCDC) and management have become increasingly common in health research. However, current knowledge about the use of HCDC in health research in China is very limited. In this study, we administered a survey to a hard-to-reach population in China using HCDC and assessed the acceptability and adoption of HCDC in China. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 67% |
India | 2 | 22% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 34% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Computer Science | 5 | 8% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,491,537
of 25,529,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#549
of 2,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,345
of 209,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,529,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.