You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Four different models for simulation-based training of bronchoscopic procedures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12890-024-02846-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sissel Højsted Kronborg, Dan Stieper Karbing, Arman Arshad, Anna Charlotte Lundgaard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
| Other | 3 | 27% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 45% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,877,881
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#501
of 2,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,382
of 353,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#10
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.